I read a BBC article that proved to be quite interesting and has the possibility of education all those people out there thinking that fat people must be eating horrid amounts of (unhealthy) food and never exercises beyond walking from their door to their cars.

The article is quite an interesting read. Some researchers have been doing some tests similar to the studies the article refers to, where naturally thin people try their best to put on weight (fat) by doing such things as eating lots and lots and/or quitting excercise for a period. And, they struggled! Even whilst eating a lot of unhealthy food and not exercising these people had a hard time putting on weight and becoming fat.

How surprising. The amounts and types of food described sounds like what they think fat people must be gorging on day in and day out. Personally, had I been eating as much and so much sweets I would have been sick. I’m one of those people who don’t eat extreme amounts at all, and when I do have a bag of sweets it will easily last me a week or two, the same goes for a, say 150 grams bar of chocolate. I know people of all sorts of sizes who marvel at how I can leave my sweets alone even when it’s directly in front of my eyes for weeks and weeks before it’s finally empty. Most of them will eat it all within a matter of minutes. I don’t know why this is so. I do have a sweet tooth, and I like having some sort of sweet on a regular basis. Not every day, but around about every second day I will have some. But it’s enough to just have a few pieces of sweets or a couple of squares of chocolate on most days. I rarely eat much more than that. But then, I am a slow eater.

And guess what? I can’t remember ever being skinny and in my most slim periods I am still considered slightly overweight according to BMI, and softly padded to look at. At the moment I’m well padded since I put on a fair bit of weight during the last semester of my Bachelors and more whilst doing my Masters. I am one of those people whose weight will fluctuate a bit, depending on a number of factors, and they do no follow the Calories in – Calories out “rule” whatsoever.

I hope these trials to make people put on weight with dismal results will help creating awareness that it’s the same way for fat people. It’s just not that easy to lose weight, and much less so to keep it off. Sadly, I expect a more likely result is that they’ll think even more that what separates fat from thin is that fatties are able to eat ‘more than they should’ and don’t exercise. And if a fat person thinks he or she eats a completely normal diet and exercises plenty, then it must be a figment of their imagination…

WoW Characters

It’s been a while since I’ve written about World of Warcraft in this blog, so I thought I would do that today.

An update since the review is that my Paladin reached lvl 80 a few weeks back. I wasn’t among the quickest to reach lvl 80, nor amongst the slowest. I wanted to take my time about it so I could just enjoy the game and not do any rushing. In the end, I did rush through the last couple of levels because the Guild was preparing to start raiding a bit (casual raiding, that is) and we needed more lvl 80 people to do 10-man Naxx.

I like Naxx, I was among the lucky people who got lots of drops the first times we went it. And we have learned the last few weeks how important it is to have reliable healers and tanks, and also there has been a lot of adjustment on dps, since many of us dps-ers are/were relatively inexperienced and had builds that needed a bit of work. I let my boyfriend build my Pally, and he had nerfed her quite badly when we started raiding because he got the idea that a build with Seal of Corruption as a central skill would be very efficient and deal lots of damage. That turned out to be very wrong, and at first he thought maybe the dps-meter didn’t count all my damage. After looking more closely we went back to a variation of my old build, centred around Seal of Command, et voila, my dps shot up into the roof.

Anyways, here is my dear Ret-a-din, in some old gear and some new, shiny purples from Naxx:

Elrawien

While I’m at it, let me present my other characters (that is, the ones that are more or less likely to get levelled sometime). My most used alt, and one I really love playing is Flavya the Hunter (currently lvl 48):

I love Flavya’s pet, the turtle Alisia who was named after a certain tree (my boyfriend’s Druid):

Next up is my Mage Maurawien (lvl 22), who was actually the first character I made on the server I play on (I originally played on another server first, but moved after TBC came out), but hasn’t really been used much since I created Elrawien:

After WotLK came out I created a Death Knight named Elisjeba (lvl 55). I haven’t really played her much, and I don’t know if I will play her very much:

And lastly, I have an Alliance toon, Eldrene the Shaman (lvl 18). Again, I don’t know how much I’ll level her. I do like this character a lot, but I really prefer playing on the Horde side and with the Guild, so we shall have to see. I mostly just play her a little bit now and then, so she might actually get levelled a bit, it’ll just take a lot of time:

And that’s it for today. I now need to go do something useful since we start moving some of our belongings back to London tomorrow.

As my boyfriend has found out we have many different types of porridge in Norway. Personally I do not eat porridge all that often, but there are a few I like a lot and make every now and then.

One porridge I’ve always loved since I was a kid is butter porridge (also known as velvet porridge). The way we make it in my family is as follows:

Take a good dash of butter into a saucepan and melt it
Add some white flour and mix together
Add a bit of milk and mix
Add one egg and mix
Add more milk till you get a nice porridge that is soft
Have in a teeny bit salt and sugar and itsy bitsy vanilla sugar/essence
Let the porridge cook whilst stirring (enough for it not to burn) for a good while (at least 15 mins, preferably a bit more).

Have the porridge in bowls. Take a little bit of butter and place it in the middle and let it melt into a tiny lake. Drizzle cinnamon and/or sugar over.

Enjoy!

Candlemaking

So I have started up with some hobbies, something I haven’t really done very much of since before I started university, despite loving this kind of activities. Some of the things I’m doing are making handbags, candles and some crocheting.

Today was the first time I tried candlemaking, which turned out to be very fun and there are many pretty candles you can make that look special and will be lovely accessories when we (my partner and I) get a new place.

I got a beginners candlemaking kit for Christmas, which is the reason I’m taking it up. I actually didn’t realise how easy it is to do this stuff yourself! The projects described in the book all seem very manageable, and the things you need for making them are all stuff you should be able to find in any well established kitchen (which excludes our very simple student kitchen, so I did have to get some items for it).

Anyways, today I did some very simple starter candles in molds that came with the starter set, and here are some pictures I took with the lovely camera my father and stepmother got me for christmas:

Since it’s my first time making them, they don’t look perfect, of course, but I’m still very happy with the result!

My boyfriend linked me to this ad on YouTube. It’s made by MediaWise. A little boy talks about he does various violent acts against people in a video game. The ad is directed at parents and ends with “Learn what’s in video games. Kids do. Go to MediaWise.org”.

You can wish to visit that website if you wish. This blogpost poses one simple question: Why are these kids playing violent games in the first place?!

There are plenty video games out there that are not violent and that are made for, and targeted at kids.

Parents are themselves responsble for what kind of video games their children are playing. If children are playing violent video games and as a result end up violent themselves, the parents can blame no one but themselves. Parents are responsible for what their children do or do not do. This is especially so in their own home.

I worked in a shop that sold video games, and I know very many parents picked up Grand Theft Auto for children who were really too young to be playing the game. These parents may later blame GTA for their children’s misbehaviour. And I want to ask: why did you by that game in the first place? You’re responsible for checking out what these games are about. When a game says it’s meant for people 18+ of age, that means it’s not suitable for 10-year olds. If a game case has a fist on it, that means the game contains violence.

So yea, my basic message is: There is nothing wrong with the video games in themselves. What is wrong is parents letting their children play games that were made for adults.

Compulsive gaming

Today I read this article on BBC’s webpage, and it’s about compulsive gaming, also known as addiction to video games. It especially considers online games. Simply put, a treatment center for gaming addicts has found that only 10% of the people seeking their help are actually addicted to the games. The other 90% (the vast majority) are compulsive gamers who have a social problem, rather than an addiction.

“These kids come in showing some kind of symptoms that are similar to other addictions and chemical dependencies,” he says.

“But the more we work with these kids the less I believe we can call this addiction. What many of these kids need is their parents and their school teachers – this is a social problem.”

In response to this realisation the clinic has changed its treatment programme for gamers to focus more on developing activity-based social and communications skills to help them rejoin society.

Further on:

“Eighty per cent of the young people we see have been bullied at school and feel isolated. Many of the symptoms they have can be solved by going back to good old fashioned communication.”

By offering compulsive gamers a place where they feel accepted and where their voice will be heard, the clinic has found that the vast majority have been able to leave gaming behind and rebuild their lives.

This means that for very many gaming ‘addicts’ what they need is to learn or relearn social skills that will keep them out there in real life, rather than hanging around in their games. It is not surprising that so many of those who get problems with their gaming also have suffered from bullying. I believe that it is easier for many to choose online activities as a way to create a social network and to find friends and feel accepted than for them to resolutely try to find friends in RL. Online you can portait yourself in whichever way you wish, there are no restrictions because people can’t see you and read your body language and thus they cannot create expectations of how you should behave. This gives freedom in a way, but it can also be a trap. Although online friendship and acceptance can keep bullied people up and running and feeling happy, it is not secret that real life friendship is also important. And whichever way you twist and turn it, you have to interact outside the computer, in work or school and other places.

The BBC article concentrates a lot on violent games, and how many of these people are aggressive and get relief from killing stuff. Although this is no doubt true, I think it is also very important to look at the non-aggressive sides of gaming as well. I have been playing MMOs for long enough to have seen both aggressiveness and non-aggressiveness among people I have played with. Without failing, aggressiveness from people in a group is destructive. This could be due to my playing mostly MMORPGs like World of Warcraft and Guild Wars, so this could be different in other types of games. Nonetheless, when one or more persons in a group are very aggressive, this has tended to be detrimental to the wellbeing of the groups and most have deteriorated, and in turn made the social acceptance moot. In groups that have been able to keep good spirits going and where overly aggressiveness is not tolerated, I haven’t seen this problem since people are encouraged to just have fun.

The main problem I have with the article is that it can portrait gamers as being an aggressive bunch who enjoy shooting stuff to let out some steam. Although this is no doubt true for many of those with a problematic relationship to their gaming, my impression of online gaming is that most people have some level of fun. There is much competition going on, and there are many people who don’t quite grasp that it’s ‘just a game’ and a loss is not the end of the world. However, games are, and should be, mostly about having a good time and to escape into another world than your own for a limited period of time.

It’s been a fair few days since Wrath of the Lich King was released by Blizzard. After having had a good look, I must say: this game is yummy! The graphics are fabulous and there’s lots of fun stuff you can do.

My character (a currently lvl 72 Blood Elf Paladin) has learned loads of new Jewelcrafting recipes. There’s a new skill for jewelcrafters called Gem Perfection, which gives a chance to create Perfect Gems, meaning that ordinary green gems can get better at around the same level of quality as the blue ones. This is very nice, and I’ve already had some good luck with that.

Both starter areas are lovely. I especially like Howling Fjord and the Taunka, distant relatives of the Tauren. The first instances are very good, with new and interesting bosses. The first time the Guild went to the Nexus was late on the release day. We were all lvl 70 still, and fourmanned it. The team set up was one warrior tank, one ret-a-din, and two druids. The instance went very well, there were no wipes despite none of us knowing the tactics for the bosses (which was part of the fun for going there in the first place). This went very well probably because of a good team set-up, we have a very reliable tank and the healer is phenomenal. All of us have done fair few instances together by now so we know each other well. I know what to do as a dps and support character with this group. The graphics of the Nexus are really gorgeous. I don’t have any screenshots on this computer, but I will post some later.

My boyfriend and I went exploring in areas we’re too low level to go to, you know, because it’s fun. There were no other players there, since most other people were desperately trying to level (after all, it was still the second day after release), and we may have been among the first to visit some of these places, at least on our server. We went to see Icecrown, and the picture below is from a screenshot of the map to show the areas we got around to seeing:

And here is a nice view from Jotunheim in Icecrown, the character is that of my boyfriend’s druid:

In Agmar’s Hammer I’ve found an orphanage for tiny Taunka babies on the top of the Inn building:

Oh, and Dalaran is a lovely city!

More will come about this game later. It is really lovely, and full of fun. Thumbs up, for Blizzard has done a very good job on this one!

I’ve been watching quite a lot of Japanese anime and science fiction films and series the past year or so. Many of them are futuristic, set in a world where humanity and computers have become somehow mixed.

Many will know of the films and series of Ghost in the Shell where some humans become cyborgs, they may have a computerised brain and/or changed their body parts to artificial limbs, some are even full cyborgs with no natural components at all. They are still humans, however, with human thoughts and feelings because they have what is a called a ‘ghost’, which is what makes you human. In the series there are also androids who are basically computers/robots who may look human or look more like robots, they do not have a ghost, and are thus not human (there are some exceptions, but I will not cover that here).

Battlestar Galactica is another well known series, this is American Sci-fi rather than Japanese anime. Here cyborgs are artificial, and they are developing rapidly and become more and more like humans, and in a way I guess you can say they do become humans. This is especially so because it appears some cyborgs can have cildren with humans, making their children part human and part cyborg (though which side is stronger in them, if there is a difference, I do not know).

Chobits is one of my favourite Japanese anime series (probably because of its girlyness), in this series persocoms have been developed, they are robots that (may) look human, but are really computers. Some are small and cute, and others are full sized adult bodies and do normal chores such as cooking and working. The story is about one of these persocoms of a very special kind, a chobit, one that actually has developed/programmed to have feelings and be more like humans, although she is not. It is really a lovestory between the chobit and her owner. However, the series takes up difficult issues such as the relationship between humans/humanity and the ever progressing technology, which may someday make such relationships possible. And this brings me to what this blog post is really about.

imagine living in a world where technology has developed so far that robots look like you and me, act very similar to you and me and do basically the same things as you and me. These themes are touched upon to some extent in all of the series I have mentioned above. What if we are actually able to construct these copies of humans?

Personally I find it very likely that the border between human and non-human will be breached to some degree. We already have some people forming relationships with realdolls, and all that is really required is to computerise them and make them able to move on their own (no easy task, I’m sure, but you get what I mean). If living, talking and active human dolls turn into a quite common phenomenon, would that have any effect on us as humans? Is it not possible that you could see men and women choosing to form relationships with these rather than finding a ‘real’ lifepartner? Imagine a boy/girlfriend or a husband/wife that you could programme to be the way you want him or her to be? You can decide his or hers ‘personality’ and in what ways he or she should react in given situations. If you tell them to do something they will do it without hesitation (unless you programmed them to, of course). Sounds like a dream, doesn’t it?

Or is it really so? Imagine that your husband/wife leaves you because of a computerised humanlooking doll. I mean, it could maybe be possible to understand and accept someone leaving for another ‘real’ person who they felt was better for them. But a computer in a humanlooking body? I think many people would find that very hard to handle. Also, imagine yourself or someone you know marrying or having long-term committed relationships with one of them. Would that be socially acceptable? Unless the technology for it is invented (or even possible) these couples will not be able to have children in the natural way. That would result in more negative reproduction.

On a more in-depth note, I have my doubts on whether or not it would even be possible to have a long-term, meaningful relationship to someone who is not a real person, someone who is programmed to act in certain ways. Ultimately it will probably be impossible (as far as I know) to create computers so advanced that they will be able to communicate and understand human interaction to the level that we humans do. This means that the people opting for these relationships may be deprived of proper human contact.

I won’t go more in-depth of these questions today. They are topics I think a lot about, and I will return to the issues I have mentioned in more depth at a later date when I have thought some more about it. It is very intriguing however, and it will be interesting to see if I live to see some developments in this direction in my lifetime.

Children and obesity

I just read a blogpost about fat kids in the UK and I am fairly shocked. Apparently some people over here believe childhood obesity is so bad that they may have to take kids from their parents and they accuse parents of abuse(!).

I would really like to know where those kids are, because except a few examples in the media I haven’t seen a single child in the UK who is so overweight there seemed to be any need to take them from their parents. I’ve lived in the UK for a year now, most of it in a family area in an ordinary UK town, and I passed a school at least once per day since it was close to my house there and I saw kids regularly all over the place. I never saw a single one who seemed to be so grossly fat as to be in immediate danger. There were chubby ones, of course, but I didn’t ever see a child who looked very fat.

I’ve known fat kids as I grew up, and I was chubby myself. None of them were abused in any way, shape or form. Most of the fat kids were large boned and came from families of large boned people, so even at their thinnest they’d still look large.

As for taking kids from their families, how is that going to work? I thought it was known that it is not recommended to put kids on a diet? Take any one family where each child eats the same food and the same amount and have the same activity level, yet one is skinny and the other fat, is only the fat child being abused by the parents?

I am not impressed.

Data analysis blues

Imagine… I’ve finished my data collection (yay!). Now I’m working on analysing all this data. I already have some impressions and ‘know’ some of what I’m going to write. First, however, I have to do my job. My method for analysis is that I’m creating an excel spreadsheet for each interview question, and in there I have a coloumn where I write down what words each participant used in reply to the question, then a coloumn where I number in which participants used these exact words. Then I have one where I group together words/sentences with the same or similar meanings, so I can get a fuller understanding of who agrees with whom. In the end I have my findings for this question.

All of this is very boring work. However, it should be done as it gives me a fuller understanding of how many think so or so is the case.

But – it’s just one part of the analysis. This is qualitative research, and I also have to go through my interviews to answer questions I have myself, but that I didn’t ask for from my interviewees unless they brought it up themselves.

I do like doing research, well, I like it when I have it all plotted into my head and all I need to do is type it out in Word. All the work about it, like data collection and analysing is rather dull. But it’s what has to be done if you want to type down all those cool stuff you want to say.

And now I’m back to the labour!